felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
felis_ultharus ([personal profile] felis_ultharus) wrote2005-09-14 08:27 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

So we've moved on to another postmodernist, Linda Hutcheon. She's the postmodernists postmodernists recommend to their sceptics, because she's saner, has some access to reality, and can carry on a discussion for some time before slipping into jargon.

So she's sort of the Locutus of postmodernism, since we apparently like borg metaphors around here :)

I'm trying to give her a fair chance. But she's already maligned my own theoretical approach about 6 times, and shown she doesn't understand it in the least, and I'm less than 5% through her book. And while she's more conscious, and more aware of reality, she's clearly too attached to many of the cynical ideas at the core of postmodernism that I just can't agree with.

It seems I'm not the only one in class. There's a guy in our course who's in the same "liberal humanist/thematicist" tradition I am, and we echo a lot of each other's points. I've already made him a convert of John Ralston Saul :)

And [livejournal.com profile] foi_nefaste? He's a former McGiller. He left because of Lecher.

One of his teachers -- the other Canadian Lit person at McGill -- had a great analogy for explaining Modernism and Postmodernism: "Modernism wanted to burn down the House of Art and Culture. Postmodernism is playing with the charred bits that are left" :)

Other than that, I'm working around the clock these days for the place that can't afford to hire me permanently. I'm working on call. For a guy who's been laid off, I seem to be clocking in more hours than when I was there officially :/

[identity profile] foi-nefaste.livejournal.com 2005-09-15 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)
He's a former McGiller. He left because of Lecher.

*squee!*

Tell him I know, approve, agree, and all the rest of it. It must be SO nice to be taking a class with a reasonable person who isn't just interested in explaining how there are no texts... :D

[identity profile] felis-ultharus.livejournal.com 2005-09-16 10:32 am (UTC)(link)
It's been said a million times already, but it can't be repeated enough: why do they spend hours explaining to us that language has no meaning? Why do they try so hard to make us understand that understanding is impossible? Why are there books and books written about how there are no texts?