(no subject)
Oct. 29th, 2008 06:43 amWe're still waiting for a Quebec election. I'm not exactly enthused. I'll be voting for a party that I hope does well, but has never won a seat in the assembly, so I'm not exactly expecting to be overjoyed on election day.
I have higher hopes for our neighbours to the south. The good news is that in state-by-state projections of electoral college votes -- the only ones that count in that most-broken-system-in-the-Western-world -- Obama has 259 solid electoral votes out of 270 needed, while McCain has 157/270. Forty-seven are leaning toward Obama, which isn't the same as victory, but if he only wins eleven of those -- or eleven of the 75 too-close-to-call -- he wins the presidency.
The broken electoral system is one of Obama's four big hurdles, and he seems to be clearing it. He's been warning against another: voter overconfidence might lead his people to stay home on election day. The department of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms seems to be on the ball preventing assassination attempts.
The other real worry, though, is Republican cheating. Because they will cheat, like they did the last two elections. Already, an unusually large number of names are disappearing from the electoral list.
Not that Obama is paradise. He's still big-business, and far too laissez-faire for my taste. I tend to vote with my heart for third parties that won't win, so I'd likely be a Naderite if I were American.
Still, it would be nice for our neighbours to choose a president talking openly about cap-and-trade systems and re-opening NAFTA.
And it'll be interesting to see what our anti-environment, pro-NAFTA, ultra-pro-American Prime Minister does if Obama wins -- especially since someone in his office tried to sabotage Obama's campaign during the primaries. I doubt Obama's people have forgotten that.
Meanwhile, in the midst of the election, Sarah Palin said some revealing things about economics.
I'd always suspected that the attachment to laissez-faire economics had more to do emotion than any real logical thinking, and Palin exposed some of that this week when she warned that Obama's "socialism" would replace people's family with the government. Then she finished with, "I don’t know what to think of having in my family Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me."
For those who don't know, the only thing Barney Frank is known for is being openly gay and a loudest and most unapologetic voice for LGBTQ equality in the US Congress. So it's coded homophobia. No surprises there, but McCain's been trying to run a fiscal-conservative platform, so it's another clue that Palin's slipped her leash.
I have higher hopes for our neighbours to the south. The good news is that in state-by-state projections of electoral college votes -- the only ones that count in that most-broken-system-in-the-Western-world -- Obama has 259 solid electoral votes out of 270 needed, while McCain has 157/270. Forty-seven are leaning toward Obama, which isn't the same as victory, but if he only wins eleven of those -- or eleven of the 75 too-close-to-call -- he wins the presidency.
The broken electoral system is one of Obama's four big hurdles, and he seems to be clearing it. He's been warning against another: voter overconfidence might lead his people to stay home on election day. The department of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms seems to be on the ball preventing assassination attempts.
The other real worry, though, is Republican cheating. Because they will cheat, like they did the last two elections. Already, an unusually large number of names are disappearing from the electoral list.
Not that Obama is paradise. He's still big-business, and far too laissez-faire for my taste. I tend to vote with my heart for third parties that won't win, so I'd likely be a Naderite if I were American.
Still, it would be nice for our neighbours to choose a president talking openly about cap-and-trade systems and re-opening NAFTA.
And it'll be interesting to see what our anti-environment, pro-NAFTA, ultra-pro-American Prime Minister does if Obama wins -- especially since someone in his office tried to sabotage Obama's campaign during the primaries. I doubt Obama's people have forgotten that.
Meanwhile, in the midst of the election, Sarah Palin said some revealing things about economics.
I'd always suspected that the attachment to laissez-faire economics had more to do emotion than any real logical thinking, and Palin exposed some of that this week when she warned that Obama's "socialism" would replace people's family with the government. Then she finished with, "I don’t know what to think of having in my family Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me."
For those who don't know, the only thing Barney Frank is known for is being openly gay and a loudest and most unapologetic voice for LGBTQ equality in the US Congress. So it's coded homophobia. No surprises there, but McCain's been trying to run a fiscal-conservative platform, so it's another clue that Palin's slipped her leash.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-29 11:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-29 11:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-29 11:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-29 12:00 pm (UTC)I have little respect for Nader after hearing that he accepted Republican finance in the 2004 election.
When I posted the results from my quiz, a new addition to my friends list (he added me from the
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 10:07 pm (UTC)I'm a firm believer in voting for what I believe in. Only in this last election this month did a candidate I vote for stand even an outside chance of victory, but I still vote my conscience.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-29 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-30 10:09 pm (UTC)She's managed to be homophobic, really right wing on economics, and religiously bigoted specifically against my religion -- along with being hypocritical and generally smug.
I really want to see her lose this election.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 03:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-31 12:42 pm (UTC)