felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
So I'm finally beginning to feel a little more human this weekend. Since the election in October, I've had the stress of a massive financial report hanging over me, and that stress was really eating into me.

I've been tense, irritable, depressed, stressed, distant, and generally unhappy for months, with recurring writer's block. But the auditor got the report back to us on Friday, [livejournal.com profile] montrealais brought it into my workplace, and I got everything signed, sealed, and delivered on Friday afternoon -- one business day before the deadline.

Then I collapsed, and slept for what felt like only the second time in five months. I was half-asleep at [livejournal.com profile] em_fish's birthday get-together, and I'm only just beginning to feel kind-of awake today.

I finished Payback -- not very coherent, though Massey Lectures rarely are, but I was still surprised to see Margaret Atwood rambling so aimlessly. She's usually so focused.

It was still a really interesting read, though. Her Christmas Carol re-imagined for the 21st century as an Earth Day Carol with its three spirits -- a Pagan earth priestess for past, a hippie for present, and a giant cockroach for Earth-Day-yet-to-come -- was hilarious, though heavy-handed even by Atwood's standards.

I also saw The Watchman, which people kept saying was like the comic panel-for-panel. Sadly exempt were the best panels, those full-page ones near the end. Still worth watching, though.
felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
I just finished Oryx and Crake. In its first pages, I found it a bit dull. Then I found it so depressing I almost stopped -- a lot of people do.

But I'm glad I kept with it. It's a wonderful novel. Very rich, very beautiful, and so wise that it can change a person's perspective on things.

It's my favourite style -- optimisitc, but not naive. Able to find hope without turning a blind eye to reality.

It opens with a man who calls himself Snowman, but was once named Jimmy. As far as he knows, he's the last ordinary human on earth. Civilization is gone, and besides him the only humanoid species is a lab-created subspecies of human beings, the Children of Crake, who were genetically programmed to be without violence, without strife -- but also without art, without love, and without religion.

I won't say more than that, because part of what's gripping about the story is gradual unravelling of the mystery of how they got there -- and Atwood is at her best here.

But I think I can say without spoiling anything that a lot of it has to do with art.

Jimmy's problem is that the dystopian world that was destroyed, and supposedly-utopian world that comes after have no place for a "word person," as he calls himself -- he's a writer in a world where the only use for writers is in advertising. There is only one painting in the book. There are no plays, no novels, and they only learn science and life in schools. The art school means he failed to do anything in the sciences, and it doubles as marketing school.

Neither world has a place for him. But both need artists vitally -- they need the larger persepctive and exploration that art and religion and history can provide, and which science can't. It's why the first world crumbles, and why the second might be stillborn if nothing changes.

It reminds me Timothy Findlay's Headhunter in that way. Problem is that while it's a message ordinary people in this country can get, it's one that elites don't. Our political, academic, and commercial classes largely see art as a frill, as a sign of luxury, and are desperate to cut all funding to it.

But they're the ones who most need to understand the message of a book like Oryx and Crake.
felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
I've been getting a lot done -- with my writing and other things. I've got a rough draft of the short story I'm sending out next week already put together, and now begins a rigorous editing process.

It's a good thing real life has been going well, because my entertainment has taken a turn for the disturbing. See, I don't like to switch novels or switch video games when I'm in the middle of one, and I made the mistake of reading Oryx and Crake at the same time as playing the horror game Silent hill 4.

Oryx and Crake really is the most frightening kind of "what if" -- not the "what if the bomb is dropped?" or "what if we opened a portal to another dimension," but just "what if we simply just keep doing what we're doing." At first it seemed pretty lacklustre, but now it's become pure Atwood, and I have to keep stopping to digest the more brutal passages before I move on to the next.

She's brilliant though. I'd like to splice her vision and psychological understanding with Heather O'Neill's style. The resulting writer would be able to re-write all of creation with her words.

And Silent Hill 4 is most disturbing of the series of that series of video games. Not because of walls that bleed angry spirits, or the post-apocalyptic empty urban landscapes, or the undefined fleshy things that slither through those landscapes. It's because the only place of safety in it is a locked, sentient room which gradually becomes more and more hostile to you the more the game progresses -- its air becomes toxic, and the room decays, and the atmosphere itself injures you.

The idea of having no place of safety, and no home to return to, is scarier to me than all the gore-encrusted prisons and hospitals that are a mainstay of the series. I honestly don't know if I can finish this game.
felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
I'm now reading Oryx and Crake, Margaret Atwood's weird dystopia, which (like all good dystopias) is about the world we live in now.

I'm almost two-fifths through it, and parts of it are like a train wreck from which no one walked away alive -- horrific, but impossible to turn away from. And all the more horrific because so much of it is true already.

And I think the Blood and Roses video game in the novel is going to haunt my nightmares.

While I try to digest one Atwood dystopia, North America is beginning to look more and more like The Handmaid's Tale.

The Third-Wave, witch-hunting, Pentecostal-breakaway Christians (including sarah Palin) are freaking me out more and more. I read a blog post by one of their number yesterday warning the faithful that Obama's Kenyan relatives are using witchcraft to win him the presidency. Unlikely, but if it's true, I urge them to tell the world so that the 90% of it who prefer Obama can send you whatever supplies you need.

The blog posted went on to urge the faithful to "cover John McCain and Sarah Palin in the blood of Christ" to help them win. I wonder if that watered-down ketchup they used to use in slasher movies would be an acceptable substitute?
felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
I finished Naomi Klein's No Logo yesterday. Like so many other books, it's one I've read a couple sections during my undergrad and post-grad years. Now, post-school, I finally had a chance to read it.

I'd been expecting either a radical, head-in-the-clouds manifesto, or a sincere-but-agonizing-slog through the myriad horrors of neo-liberal economic fanaticism. What I got was clear-headed, clear-eyed, careful analysis written in plain English and backed up with heavy research and personal interviews.

It's less a manifesto, and more like a history book, documenting the successes and failures of recent anti-corporate movements, trying to figure out what works and what doesn't, and where to go from here.

She uses much of the same ideas and explores the same concepts about commons, democracy, and the public good -- the same non-secular-but-humanist perspective -- as a group of other Canadian thinkers that risen to the fore in progressive circles: John Ralston Saul, David Suzuki, and Linda McQuaig. I think at this point we can pretty call them a movement -- the Canadian Humanist Movement sounds nice to me.

Of course, we aren't going to call them a movement, because that might imply we have a culture, or that it might matter - peu importe they're all internationally-recognized names in lefty political circles. Meanwhile, in other circles, the Conservatives have just finished gleefully eviscerating the arts -- this time explicitly killing arts projects that don't fit their neo-con worldview. And I'm sorely disappointed by the lack of outrage I'm seeing.

Last year, Margaret Atwood said of the Harperites' view on artists and writers, "They basically just hate us. You know it’s people who have never seen any arts in their own lives — they would rather not have gardens, they would rather have parking lots. They just think it’s a frill probably."

The problem is, the People-Who-Would-Rather-Not-Have-Gardens have power. Let's hope we can topple them before they turn this rich and wonderful country into a parking lot for their SUVs.

On that note, anyone who's in the three by-election areas -- Guelph, Westmount-Ville-Marie, or Saint-Lambert, please get out and vote. It's September 8th, unless Harper calls a general election. Remember, any vote not cast counts as an de facto endorsement of the winner.
felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
Margaret Atwood celebrates 100 years of Anne of Green Gables in a Guardian article here:

"In my sourer moments, I confess to having imagined yet another Anne sequel, to be called Anne Goes on the Town. This would be a grim, Zolaesque epic that would chronicle the poor girl's enticement by means of puffed sleeves, then her sexual downfall and her subsequent brutal treatment at the hands of harsh male clients. Then would follow the pilfering of her ill-got though hard-earned gains by an evil madam, her dull despair self-medicated by alcohol and opium-smoking, and her sufferings from the ravages of an incurable STD. The final chapter would contain some Traviata-like coughing, her early and ugly death, and her burial in an unmarked grave, with nothing to mark the passing of this waif with a heart of gold but a volley of coarse jokes from her former customers.

However, the presiding genius of Anne is not the gritty grey Angel of Realism, but the rainbow-coloured, dove-winged Godlet of the Heart's Desire. As Oscar Wilde said about second marriages, Anne is the triumph of hope over experience: it tells us not the truth about life, but the truth about wish fulfilment. And the main truth about wish fulfilment is that most people vastly prefer it to the alternative."
felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
Got called into work this afternoon. Not to do placement tests, but to my old job in administration, which I prefer.

They were swamped. Paper was stacked everywhere. Teachers were coming in for books for courses that hadn't even been entered in the computer yet. We were fed-exing textbooks to Quebec for courses that didn't even teachers yet, but were supposed to start Monday. And nobody knew what was going on because the people in charge of this mountain of paper were stuck doing phone tests all day.

I think I made a dent in the paperwork, though not much more than a dent. I'm still not officially working there though, but if things keep up like this, I won't-be-officially-working-there full time.

Other than than, I'm about 48 pages into my novel, and I'm enjoying Solomon Gursky still immensly. But it seems my big project will be on Susanna Moodie and Margaret Atwood. I can't wait to tell them all my theories of Susanna Moodie's secret life hunting ninjas in the Canadian wilderness.

(It's Concordia university. If I handed that in as a final paper, I'd still only get an A-)

Profile

felis_ultharus: The Pardoner from the Canterbury Tales (Default)
felis_ultharus

September 2011

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 12 1314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios